ISPconfig3 und geblockete E-Mails

Dieses Thema im Forum "Installation und Konfiguration" wurde erstellt von pezi, 26. Aug. 2010.

  1. pezi

    pezi New Member

    Ich stehe vor dem Probem, dass manche eingehene E-Mails für den Kunden geblockt werden. Der Kunde hat den Spam-Filter schon deaktviert - no entabled -

    Trotzdem wird manche wichtige E-Mail (z.B. von der Bank) geblockt werden. (Log ist gekürzt und Zieladresse ist geändert)

    Blocked SPAM, [91.212.136.3] [91.212.136.3] <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Message-ID: <OFB4B50954.0E85094E-ONC1257777.00242431-C1257777.0029A4FE@bawagpsk.com>, mail_id: VJgVLuoeH1FR, Hits: 7.242, size: 292327, 1089 ms

    Was läuft hier schief?

    Peter



    PHP:
    connect from isc-mx.mymailwall.com[91.212.136.3]
    Net::Server2010/08/06-09:33:34 CONNECT TCP Peer"127.0.0.1:40339" Local"127.0.0.1:10024"
    idle_prochi was idle675151.6 mstotal idle 19687.158 sbusy 45.539 s
    loaded base policy bank
    lookup_ip_acl 
    (inet_acl): key="127.0.0.1" matches "127.0.0.1"result=1
    process_request
    fileno sock=12STDIN=0STDOUT=1
    switch_to_my_time     480 s
    , new request
    ESMTP
    XFORWARD NAME=isc-mx.mymailwall.com ADDR=91.212.136.3\r\n
    switch_to_my_time     480 s
    SMTP XFORWARD received
    ESMTP
    250 2.5.0 Ok XFORWARD
    switch_to_client_time 480 s
    smtp response sent
    ESMTP
    XFORWARD PROTO=SMTP HELO=scanlab01.mymailwall.com SOURCE=REMOTE\r\n
    switch_to_my_time     480 s
    SMTP XFORWARD received
    ESMTP
    250 2.5.0 Ok XFORWARD
    ESMTP
    MAIL FROM:<XXXXi@bawagpsk.comSIZE=292327\r\n
    switch_to_my_time     480 s
    SMTP MAIL received
    check_mail_begin_task
    task_count=17
    lookup_ip_acl
    key="91.212.136.3"no match
    lookup 
    [debug_sender] => undef"XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
    ESMTP
    250 2.1.0 Sender <XXXXi@bawagpsk.comOK
    switch_to_client_time 480 s
    smtp response sent
    ESMTP
    RCPT TO:<XXXX@hotel.invalidORCPT=rfc822;XXXX@hotel.invalid\r\n
    switch_to_my_time     480 s
    SMTP RCPT received
    lookup_acl
    (XXXX@hotel.invalid), no match
    lookup 
    [local_domains] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    lookup_sql 
    "XXXX@hotel.invalid"query args"ARRAY(0xcb40010)""ARRAY(0xc9f57d8)""ARRAY(0xcae3a7c)""ARRAY(0xcacbd1c)""ARRAY(0xc930538)"
    lookup_sql selectSELECT *,spamfilter_users.id FROM spamfilter_users LEFT JOIN spamfilter_policy ON spamfilter_users.policy_id=spamfilter_policy.id WHERE spamfilter_users.email IN (?,?,?,?,?) ORDER BY spamfilter_users.priority DESC
    sql begin
    nontransaction
    sql
    executing clauseSELECT *,spamfilter_users.id FROM spamfilter_users LEFT JOIN spamfilter_policy ON spamfilter_users.policy_id=spamfilter_policy.id WHERE spamfilter_users.email IN (?,?,?,?,?) ORDER BY spamfilter_users.priority DESC
    lookup_sql
    "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no match
    lookup_sql_field
    (message_size_limit), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup 
    [message_size_limit] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    ESMTP
    250 2.1.5 Recipient <XXXX@hotel.invalidOK
    switch_to_client_time 480 s
    smtp response sent
    lookup 
    [users.id] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    wbl
    : (SQLrecip <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, 0 matches
    lookup 
    [blacklist_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    query_keys
    XXXXi@bawagpsk.competra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
    lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
    lookup 
    [blacklist_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>,blacklist_sender] => undef"XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
    lookup 
    [whitelist_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    query_keys
    XXXXi@bawagpsk.competra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
    lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
    lookup 
    [whitelist_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>,whitelist_sender] => undef"XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
    lookup_hash
    (XXXX@hotel.invalidmatches keys"."=>ARRAY(0xa8d09a4)
    lookup [score_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>,score_sender], 1 matches for "XXXX@hotel.invalid"results"."=>[Amavis::Lookup::RE=ARRAY(0xa8d0794),HASH(0xa8d0800)]
    lookup_re("XXXXi@bawagpsk.com"), no matches
    query_keys
    XXXXi@bawagpsk.competra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
    lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
    lookup 
    [score_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>] => undef"XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
    prolong_timer spam_scan_sa_finish
    timer set to 479 s
    prolong_timer spam_scan
    remaining time 479 s
    enqueue
    stat is not numeric""
    lookup_sql_field(spam_tag_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="2"
    lookup [spam_tag_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="2"matching_key="(constant:2)"
    lookup_sql_field(spam_tag2_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="6.2"
    lookup [spam_tag2_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="6.2"matching_key="(constant:6.2)"
    lookup [spam_tag3_level] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    lookup_sql_field
    (spam_kill_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="6.9"
    lookup [spam_kill_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="6.9"matching_key="(constant:6.9)"
    lookup_sql_field(message_size_limit), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup 
    [message_size_limit] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    lookup_sql_field
    (spam_lover), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup_hash
    (XXXX@hotel.invalid), no matches
    lookup 
    [Lovers2,spam_lovers] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    blocking contents category is 
    (6) for XXXX@hotel.invalid
    blocking ccat
    =6SMTP response250 2.7.0 Okdiscardedid=06471-17 SPAM
    do_notify_and_quar
    ccat=Spam (6,0) ("6":Spam"5":Spammy"1,1":CleanTag"1":Clean"0":CatchAllccat_block=(6), qar_mth=
    lookup_sql_field(spam_tag_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="2"
    lookup [spam_tag_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="2"matching_key="(constant:2)"
    lookup_sql_field(spam_tag2_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="6.2"
    lookup [spam_tag2_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="6.2"matching_key="(constant:6.2)"
    lookup_sql_field(spam_kill_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="6.9"
    lookup [spam_kill_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="6.9"matching_key="(constant:6.9)"
    lookup_sql_field(spam_quarantine_to), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup
    : (scalarmatchesresult="spam-quarantine"
    lookup [spam_quarantine_to] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matchesresult="spam-quarantine"matching_key="(constant:spam-quarantine)"
    lookup_sql_field(spam_quarantine_cutoff_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup 
    [spam_quarantine_cutoff_level] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    lookup_sql_field
    (spam_admin), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
    lookup_hash
    (XXXX@hotel.invalid), no matches
    lookup 
    [spam_admin] => undef"XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
    lookup 
    [spam_quarantine_bysender_to] => undef"XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
    header
    X-Spam-FlagYES\n
    header
    X-Spam-Score7.242\n
    header
    X-Spam-Level: *******\n
    header
    X-Spam-StatusYesscore=7.242 tag=2 tag2=6.2 kill=6.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,\n\tDNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188,\n\tHTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.526HTML_MESSAGE=0.001MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]\n\tautolearn=no\n
    header
    X-Quarantine-ID: <VJgVLuoeH1FR>\n
    header
    X-Envelope-To-Blocked: <XXXX@hotel.invalid>\n
    header
    X-Envelope-To: <XXXX@hotel.invalid>\n
    header
    X-Envelope-From: <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>\n
    header
    Receivedfrom mail.sciencesoft.at ([127.0.0.1])\n\tby localhost (mail.sciencesoft.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\n\twith ESMTP id VJgVLuoeH1FR for <XXXX@hotel.invalid>;\n\tFri,  6 Aug 2010 09:33:34 +0200 (CEST)\n
    DO_QUARANTINE
    local:spam-%m.gz, <> -> spam-quarantine
    skip local delivery
    (3): <> -> <spam-quarantine>
    one_response_for_all <>: successr=0,b=0,d=0ndn_needed=0'250 2.6.0 Ok, skip local delivery(3), id=06471-17'
    DO_QUARANTINE done
    SPAM
    , <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Yesscore=7.242 tag=2 tag2=6.2 kill=6.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.526HTML_MESSAGE=0.001MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396autolearn=noquarantine VJgVLuoeH1FR (spam-quarantine)
    skip admin notificationno administrators
    do_notify_and_quarantine 
    done
    prolong_timer quar
    +notifremaining time 479 s
    DSN
    sender NOT credibleSA7.242, <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>
    lookup: (scalarmatchesresult="10"
    lookup [spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender] => true,  "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" matchesresult="10"matching_key="(constant:10)"
    dsn: . 250 Spam <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>: on_succ=0on_dly=1on_fail=1never=0warn_sender=, DSN_passed_on=, mta_resp"250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM"
    DSNSUCC (discarded) . 250 Spamdestiny=DISCARD: <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>
    one_response_for_all <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>: all DISCARD'250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM'
    notif=Nsuppressed=0ndn_needed=, exit=99250 2.7.0 Okdiscardedid=06471-17 SPAM
    prolong_timer delivery
    -notificationremaining time 479 s
    fish_out_ip_from_received
    91.212.136.3
    lookup_ip_acl 
    (publicnetworks): key="91.212.136.3" matches "::FFFF:0:0/96"result=1
    parse_ip_address_from_received
    91.212.136.3
    Blocked SPAM
    , [91.212.136.3] [91.212.136.3] <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Message-ID: <OFB4B50954.0E85094E-ONC1257777.00242431-C1257777.0029A4FE@bawagpsk.com>, mail_idVJgVLuoeH1FRHits7.242size2923271089 ms 
     
  2. pezi

    pezi New Member

    Nach weiterem Investigieren - das Problem dürfte der
    der Wert
    sa_kill_level_deflt =
    in amisd.conf zu tief (6.1) gesetzt war. Ich habe diesen nun 10 gesetzt.
     
  3. Laubie

    Laubie Member

    Jetzt haben wir schon August... und der 2010-bug lebt immer noch ;)

    Code:
    FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188
    mach mal ein

    Code:
    sa-update
    Laubie
     

Diese Seite empfehlen